Post Four of series “It is not enough to be
compassionate you must act (14th Dalai Lama).”
Economic inequality
Below I have summarized the findings outlined in Barbara
Ehrenreich’s book, Nickle and Dimed: On (Not) Getting by in America:
·
No, you cannot survive and take care of your
basic needs on a minimum wage salary.
·
The welfare system has unrealistic expectations
of those who need assistance. (For example, the system assumes those in need
can mobilize easily to apply for multiple positions in an extended radius).
·
Within the United States there exists a “culture
of inequality,” where low- wage workers face daily hurdles and repressive
measures that stagnate their possibilities of a stable lifestyle.
Dr. Ehrenreich set out to test her ability to survive and
meet her immediate needs on a minimum wage salary for a period of nine months. She
moved from Florida to Maine and finally to Missouri working in a variety of
settings to cover her basic needs. This first hand account enables one to
identify and understand the daily plight of the low-wage worker. After reading Nickle and Dimed I conducted a web
search to determine why so many colleges and some high schools had chosen this
book as a summer read. I found no substantive information beyond lists of
reflection questions. However, this book did find its way to the reading list
of my doctoral course on Economics and Leadership, although, as a group we chose
to read Savage Inequalities by Kozol,
an account of the incredibly poor state of public education in certain
“unattended to” areas throughout the country. I knew I would get to this book
someday and I am very happy that I did.
To stimulate change, who should be reading this book? How many policy
makers and politicians have read Nickle
and Dimed and would that make a difference?
Inequality of opportunity
The very same day I finished Nickle and Dimed I picked up the Washington Post and read Larry
Summer’s op ed article (7/16/12), Our
inequality of opportunity…. Summers first states that the distribution of
income is far worse than it was a generation ago, and with the present state of
the economy, this trend will continue. (No progressive made since the
publishing of Nickle and Dimed!) He briefly outlines the progressive and
conservative viewpoints suggested to alter these economic trends, but quickly
moves to encourage a different dialog on economic policy, that of improving
equality of (educational) opportunity. If we want workers to have better
opportunities, shouldn’t we ensure that they can afford and receive a high
quality education? Summers suggests that:
·
We improve public education (wow! – a huge feat)
·
Universities continue to work to increase
enrollment of minority populations.
·
With the same push universities have put toward increasing
racial and cultural diversity, they should set in place policies to increase
economic diversity.
I have not achieved much through this blog beyond
summarizing a study and an opinion on the state of our economy with a suggested
correlation to the state of our education system. Is this a, what came first, the chicken or
the egg scenario? Does the lack of educational opportunity create poverty or do
the dire economic conditions make educational opportunities inaccessible for
many? I wish I could do more; I admit that I feel a bit hopeless. Well, I did
find a new twitter follower
(WeCanEndPoverty) to give me some ideas, and I have investigated when the next
Literacy Volunteers of America training is taking place in my area. What else
can I DO to make a difference? Maybe the courageous approach taken by the author
of the next book I am reading, The Fist
and the Heart, will motivate me to DO more to help change this “culture of
inequality.”